<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beating noisy Twitter apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web.2point1.com/2009/11/29/beating-noisy-twitter-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web.2point1.com/2009/11/29/beating-noisy-twitter-apps/</link>
	<description>Tim Whitlock&#039;s home in the Blogohedron</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 22:22:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kai</title>
		<link>http://web.2point1.com/2009/11/29/beating-noisy-twitter-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/?p=269#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Nice explanation. I&#039;m still amazed that Twitter hasn&#039;t implemented basic permissions around oAuth. 

You&#039;d think that would be a higher priority than a ReTweet feature that no one wanted or needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice explanation. I&#8217;m still amazed that Twitter hasn&#8217;t implemented basic permissions around oAuth. </p>
<p>You&#8217;d think that would be a higher priority than a ReTweet feature that no one wanted or needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://web.2point1.com/2009/11/29/beating-noisy-twitter-apps/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web.2point1.com/?p=269#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Actually nothing needs doing other than Twitter to enforce their API terms of service

The API rules state

&quot;Get each user&#039;s consent before sending Tweets or other messages on their behalf. A user authenticating with your application does not constitute consent to send a message.&quot;

http://twitter.com/apirules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually nothing needs doing other than Twitter to enforce their API terms of service</p>
<p>The API rules state</p>
<p>&#8220;Get each user&#8217;s consent before sending Tweets or other messages on their behalf. A user authenticating with your application does not constitute consent to send a message.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/apirules" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/apirules</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
